Marcin Rusak: “I am not a conventional furniture designer”

I’ve come to realise that I don’t want to answer this question. I’m interested in research, which is what my grandfather did on flower species. For me it’s an extremely personal thing because it takes me back to my memories of my childhood. My grandfather grew flowers, a business that nobody wanted to take on, which folded around the time of my birth, which means I’ve only got the abandonment phase in my memory. 

Obviously he did it with a completely different mindset. I’m far more interested in how people compare to orchids, how their human emotions compare to the way in which these flowers interact with their environment over time.  

Certainly, that’s quite true. I’m not a conventional furniture designer – I use flowers and sculpture to engage with these subjects. It’s all to do with learning from a material that changes, ages and evolves, becoming increasingly more committed, connected with humans until it decays completely. It binds you to it and there comes a point when you don’t want it to disappear. The contrast between these two notions fascinated and interested me right from the start.  

The initial idea for the material was based around a bacterium injected into flowers suspended in resin. Over a period of years, decades even, the bacterium would feed off the flowers and consumes them, leaving a void where life was. . Eventually, however, in the current implementation of the material, the flowers are left intact, eternalized in their state.  On the other hand, Flower Monster, for example, was informed by the concept of manipulation. In 2014 it wasn’t generally known that flowers were manipulated to suit our needs, consuming a good deal of energy. I was fascinated by the idea that it took such an enormous effort to produce these natural things, which we bring into our homes and which symbolise life, only for them to last such a short time.  

I try not to have an ending to the work, to not complete it. As soon as I physically finish a piece, the real process starts, when I leave it be and the environment, nature and people appropriate it. Our concern over how the works will age, how they will become is the aspect that causes me the most reflection. With some of the Perishable vases we’ve sold, we’ve got an agreement that we can go back and see how they’ve evolved and what they will become. 

Precisely, in fact there’s an underlying frenzy that doesn’t permit me to work on just one piece at once. The body of my work is called Living Archive, with a life of its own that goes on even post our intervention. I’m starting to think that the moment I feel least at ease is the most intriguing part of the creative process, alert to the direction it might take. Sometimes I have ideas that I need to concretise or visualise immediately. That means taking time and some breaks in order to grapple with the real meaning. Sometimes I think there’s no other way but to create instinctively and rationalise later. I feel constricted if I follow the reverse process.  

Which we harness internally here in our studio with a team of 11 people, and a lot of experimentation. I couldn’t think of entrusting other people with creating an object, and what we mainly do is conceive the next project. I have a strange relationship with my objects. While I’m making them I’m totally focused on them, then they’re done and I immediately leap into something else.   

I have a complex and split personality, introverted and extroverted at the same time. I live in alternating states of exaltation and sadness, and this affects my work. After two years of research and experimentation on a job, the moment it "clicks" is the most exciting for me. 

A creative.